1. US Department of Health and Human Services. The selection of patients for x-ray examinations: dental radiographic examinations. DHHS Publication FDA 88-8273. Rockville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services; 1987.
2. Brooks SL, Brand JW, Gibbs SJ, et al. Imaging of the temporomandibular joint. A position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;83:609–18.
2. Brooks SL, Brand JW, Gibbs SJ, et al. Imaging of the temporomandibular joint. A position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;83:609–18.
3. Tyndall DA, Brooks SL, editors. Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;89:630–7.
4. White SC, Heslop EW, Hollender LG, et al. Parameters of radiologic care. An official report of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001; 91:498–511.
5. Tyndall DA, Ludlow JB, Platin E, Nair M. A comparison of Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film and the Siemens Sidexis digital imaging system for caries detection using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;85:113–8.
6. White SC, Yoon DC. Comparative performance of digital and conventional images for detecting proximal surface caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1997;26:32–8.
7. Nair MK, Ludlow JB, Tyndall DA, et al. Periodontitis detection efficacy of film and digital images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;85:608–12.
8. Paurazas SB, Geist JR, Pink FE, et al. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital imaging by using CCD and CMOS-APS sensors with E-speed film in the detection of periapical bony lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;89:356–62.
9. White SC, Rudolph DJ. Alterations of the trabecular pattern of the jaws in patients with osteoporosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;88:628–35.
10. Webber RL, Messura JK. An in vivo comparison of diagnostic information obtained from tuned-aperture computed tomography and conventional digital radiographic imaging modalities. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 88:239–47.
11. Terakado M, Hashimoto K, Arai Y, et al. Diagnostic imaging with newly developed ortho cubic super-high resolution computed tomography (Ortho-CT). Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;89:509–18.
12. Tasaki MM, Westesson P-L. Temporomandibular joint: diagnostic accuracy with sagittal and coronal MR imaging. Radiology 1993;186:723–9.
13. Westesson P-L, Brooks SL. Temporomandibular joint: relationship between MR evidence of effusion and the presence of pain and disk displacement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;159:559–63.
14. Smith HJ, Larheim TA, Aspestrand F. Rheumatic and nonrheumatic disease in the temporomandibular joint: gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1992;185:229–34.
15. Larheim TA, Westesson PL, Hicks DG, et al. Osteonecrosis of the temporomandibular joint: correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and histology. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;57:888–98.
16. Orsini MG, Kuboki T, Terada S, et al. Diagnostic value of 4 criteria to interpret temporomandibular joint normal disk position on magnetic resonance imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;86:489–97.
17. Tyndall DA, Sulik KK. Effects of magnetic resonance imaging on eye development in the C57BL/6J mouse. Teratology 1991;43:263–75.
18. Shimizu M, Ussmüller J, Hartwein J, et al. Statistical study for sonographic differential diagnosis of tumorous lesions in the parotid gland. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;88:226–33.
19. Shimizu M, Ussmüller J, Hartwein J, Donath K. A comparative study of sonographic-histopathologic findings of tumorous lesions in the parotid gland. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;88:723–37.
20. Yoshiura K, Yuasa K, Tabata O, et al. Reliability of ultrasonography and sialography in the diagnosis of Sjögren’s syndrome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;83:400–7.
21. Emshoff R, Bertram S, Rudisch A, Gassner R. The diagnostic value of ultrasonography to determine the temporomandibular disk position. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;84:688–96.
22. Ell PJ, Khan O. Emission computerized tomography: clinical applications. Semin Nucl Med 1981;11:50-60.
23. Khan O, Archibald A, Thomson E, Maharaj P. The role of quantitative single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) in the osseous integration process of dental implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;90:228–32.
24. DeNucci DJ, Chen CC, Sobiski C, Meehan S. The use of SPECT bone scans to evaluate patients with idiopathic jaw pain. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;90:750–7.
25. Westesson P-L, Bronstein SL. Temporomandibular joint: comparison of single- and double-contrast arthrography. Radiology 1987;164:65–70.
26. Whaley K, Blair S, Low PS, et al. Sialographic abnormalities in Sjögren’s syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, and other arthritides and connective tissue diseases: a clinical and radiological investigation using hydrostatic sialography. Clin Radiol 1972;23:474–82.
27. O’Hara AE. Sialography: past, present and future. CRC Crit Rev Clin Radiol Nucl Med 1973;15:87–139.
28. Paesani D, Westesson P-L, Hatala MP, et al. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis for TMJ internal derangement and arthrosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;73:360–3.
29. Habets LL, Bezuur JN, Jimenez Lopez V, Hansson TL. The OPG: an aid in TMJ diagnosis. III. A comparison between lateral tomography and dental rotational panoramic radiography (orthopantomography). J Oral Rehabil 1989;16:401–6.
30. Eckerdal O, Lundberg M. The structural situation in temporomandibular joints: a comparison between conventional oblique transcranial radiography, tomography, and histologic sections. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1979;8:42–9.
31. Pullinger AG, White SC. Efficacy of TMJ radiographs in terms of expected versus actual findings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995;79:367–74.
32. White SC, Pullinger AG. Impact of TMJ radiographs on clinician decision making. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995;79:375–81.
33. Callender KI, Brooks SL. The usefulness of tomography in the evaluation of patients with temporomandibular disorders: a retrospective clinical study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996;81:710–9.
34. Rubin P, Holt JF. Secretory sialography in diseases of the major salivary glands. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1957;77:575–98.
35. Cooper RA, Cowan RA, Owens SE, et al. Does salivary gland scintigraphy predict response to pilocarpine in patients with post-radiotherapy xerostomia. Eur J Nucl Med 1999;26:220–5.
36. Sato N, Kawabe R, Fujita K, Omura S. Differential diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy with intranodal color Doppler flow signals in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;86:482–8.
15. Larheim TA, Westesson PL, Hicks DG, et al. Osteonecrosis of the temporomandibular joint: correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and histology. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;57:888–98.
16. Orsini MG, Kuboki T, Terada S, et al. Diagnostic value of 4 criteria to interpret temporomandibular joint normal disk position on magnetic resonance imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;86:489–97.
17. Tyndall DA, Sulik KK. Effects of magnetic resonance imaging on eye development in the C57BL/6J mouse. Teratology 1991;43:263–75.
18. Shimizu M, Ussmüller J, Hartwein J, et al. Statistical study for sonographic differential diagnosis of tumorous lesions in the parotid gland. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;88:226–33.
19. Shimizu M, Ussmüller J, Hartwein J, Donath K. A comparative study of sonographic-histopathologic findings of tumorous lesions in the parotid gland. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;88:723–37.
20. Yoshiura K, Yuasa K, Tabata O, et al. Reliability of ultrasonography and sialography in the diagnosis of Sjögren’s syndrome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;83:400–7.
21. Emshoff R, Bertram S, Rudisch A, Gassner R. The diagnostic value of ultrasonography to determine the temporomandibular disk position. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;84:688–96.
22. Ell PJ, Khan O. Emission computerized tomography: clinical applications. Semin Nucl Med 1981;11:50-60.
23. Khan O, Archibald A, Thomson E, Maharaj P. The role of quantitative single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) in the osseous integration process of dental implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;90:228–32.
24. DeNucci DJ, Chen CC, Sobiski C, Meehan S. The use of SPECT bone scans to evaluate patients with idiopathic jaw pain. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;90:750–7.
25. Westesson P-L, Bronstein SL. Temporomandibular joint: comparison of single- and double-contrast arthrography. Radiology 1987;164:65–70.
26. Whaley K, Blair S, Low PS, et al. Sialographic abnormalities in Sjögren’s syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, and other arthritides and connective tissue diseases: a clinical and radiological investigation using hydrostatic sialography. Clin Radiol 1972;23:474–82.
27. O’Hara AE. Sialography: past, present and future. CRC Crit Rev Clin Radiol Nucl Med 1973;15:87–139.
28. Paesani D, Westesson P-L, Hatala MP, et al. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis for TMJ internal derangement and arthrosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;73:360–3.
29. Habets LL, Bezuur JN, Jimenez Lopez V, Hansson TL. The OPG: an aid in TMJ diagnosis. III. A comparison between lateral tomography and dental rotational panoramic radiography (orthopantomography). J Oral Rehabil 1989;16:401–6.
30. Eckerdal O, Lundberg M. The structural situation in temporomandibular joints: a comparison between conventional oblique transcranial radiography, tomography, and histologic sections. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1979;8:42–9.
31. Pullinger AG, White SC. Efficacy of TMJ radiographs in terms of expected versus actual findings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995;79:367–74.
32. White SC, Pullinger AG. Impact of TMJ radiographs on clinician decision making. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995;79:375–81.
33. Callender KI, Brooks SL. The usefulness of tomography in the evaluation of patients with temporomandibular disorders: a retrospective clinical study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996;81:710–9.
34. Rubin P, Holt JF. Secretory sialography in diseases of the major salivary glands. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1957;77:575–98.
35. Cooper RA, Cowan RA, Owens SE, et al. Does salivary gland scintigraphy predict response to pilocarpine in patients with post-radiotherapy xerostomia. Eur J Nucl Med 1999;26:220–5.
36. Sato N, Kawabe R, Fujita K, Omura S. Differential diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy with intranodal color Doppler flow signals in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;86:482–8.